“MLS Power Grab: Undermining Soccer Culture and Competitive Integrity”

Major League Soccer (MLS) has spent nearly three decades self serving and attempting to reshape the landscape of American soccer, but its strategies are not only misguided but also threaten to erode the sport’s foundation. Despite commanding a paltry 1 to 2 percent market share, MLS is aggressively expanding its control across America, notably dismantling traditional tournaments and undermining the integrity of the game.

The commercial landscape of minor league soccer in the United States is in a state of dire straits, grappling with an alarming number of failures in attracting both fans and sponsors. Since 1992, the graveyard of over 150 defunct professional clubs stands as a stark testament to the unrelenting struggle, with the vast majority of casualties stemming from the minor league sector. A significant contributor to this catastrophic scenario is Major League Soccer’s iron-fisted control over the top tier, a dominance that proves not only counterproductive but also destructive to the growth of the sport domestically.

Minor league soccer’s commercial viability is hanging by a thread, with its efforts to allure fans and sponsors met with resounding indifference. The numerous fallen clubs underscore the harsh reality of an environment where minor league teams face insurmountable challenges in carving out a sustainable existence. Yet, MLS’s myopic focus on maintaining its exclusive hold on the top tier has exacerbated the commercial woes of the lower echelons, leaving them to languish in obscurity.

MLS’s ruthless monopoly over the highest echelon of American soccer is a double-edged sword that slashes through the prospects of minor league soccer. The concentration of attention, financial backing, and corporate partnerships at the MLS level leaves minor league teams scrambling for meager scraps. This not only stifles their growth but also places an insurmountable barrier on the potential development of regional fan bases, grassroots talent, and independent sponsorships.

The current hierarchical structure, with MLS as the sole gatekeeper to the top tier, is an impediment to the organic growth of the sport in the United States. Instead of fostering an inclusive environment that nurtures local talent and encourages community engagement, MLS’s stranglehold on the soccer landscape promotes a cutthroat competition that stifles the very essence of the game.

The recent disgraceful power play by MLS in removing all but 8 MLS teams from the historic US Open Cup, the only open competition organized by the US Soccer Federation which MLS has power and control of, is a blatant disregard for the tournament’s century-old legacy. Open competitions allow for a genuine meritocracy, fostering excitement for fans and providing a crucial platform for aspiring players. MLS’s influence over the federation has led to a troubling erosion of these essential elements.

After years of embedding reserve teams in the USL Championship it exposed the shortcomings of MLS in attracting local support for MLS reserve teams. Despite the league’s grand aspirations, games struggled to draw more than a few hundred spectators, prompting a  withdrawal from the USL. In response, MLS created its own reserve league, MLS Next Pro, which, despite its classification as the third tier of US soccer, failed to capture sustained interest, exemplified by the short-lived Rochester franchise who the MLS infamously appointed soccer star Jamie Vardy as the club owner.

MLS’s latest expansion endeavors, particularly in Chattanooga and Oakland, raise red flags about the league’s intentions with a history of trying to stifle competition.  The recent move in Oakland, orchestrated by a former associate with the USL’s Oakland Roots Club and San Jose Earthquakes, is marred by controversy due to the unpopularity of the San Jose Earthquakes’ owner, Jon Fisher, who has alienated the community by relocating a baseball team from Oakland to Las Vegas. The establishment of a town franchise as the reserve team for the Earthquakes leaves fans very skeptical of MLS’s intentions.

The audacious move to take over operations of the USL Orange County Championship, effectively kicking the local USL team out of its home, is a prime example of MLS’s questionable tactics. The outrage from local fans, who adamantly opposed LA Galaxy’s intrusion into their soccer community, underscores the resistance against MLS’s hegemonic ambitions.

Looking ahead, there is a looming threat that MLS will encroach on USL territories, attempting to monopolize market share. However, the subpar quality of play in MLS Next Pro, often resembling mere scrimmages, raises doubts about the league’s commitment to providing a compelling and competitive product. MLS’s fixation on stifling competition rather than elevating the game suggests a shortsighted approach that will ultimately hinder its ability to triumph in the soccer war with USL.

MLS’s history of killing off USL teams, as exemplified by the death of USL San Diego Loyal upon the announcement of MLS San Diego, paints a troubling picture of the league’s disregard for soccer culture and tradition.

However, the resilient position of USL presents a formidable challenge to any MLS Next Pro teams vying for supremacy in the stuggling minor league landscape. MLS’s unchecked pursuit of commercial dominance threatens to dismantle the vibrant and diverse soccer industry in the United States, raising many questions about the league’s true commitment to the sport.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *